tartysuz: (Default)
tartysuz ([personal profile] tartysuz) wrote2011-02-06 03:01 pm
Entry tags:

Incepting a Notion

Man, Christopher Nolan looks like Leonardi di Caprio. I wonder if that was a criterion in casting Cobb?
yourlibrarian: Angel and Lindsey (Default)

[personal profile] yourlibrarian 2011-02-07 04:14 am (UTC)(link)
I would agree with their definition of derivative as they seem to be seeing it -- something essentially like a show spinoff. By contrast I think fanfic is only ever partially about the central canon it uses, but is also drawing from other fanfic and other sources. I like Abigail Derecho's definition of it as archontic, though whether that definition catches on, who can say?

[identity profile] tartysuz.livejournal.com 2011-02-18 06:34 am (UTC)(link)
Sorry to be so late in replying!

"Derivative" still sounds derogative to me, even when it's in the title of an award. In that case, they could have used other terms, like "spin-off," "tie-in," "supplemental," etc.

You make an excellent point that fan fiction is not necessarily about the source material. For that reason, "derivative" is also inappropriate, even besides the negative connotation.

I had recently finished reading Derecho's essay in "Fan Fictions and Fan Communities." I really like the idea of what she calls the "archontic," but I don't think the term will catch on. It doesn't have root word that people can easily associate with writing.

yourlibrarian: Angel and Lindsey (Default)

[personal profile] yourlibrarian 2011-02-18 08:47 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes, I suspect it will be used mostly in academic circles, though those can be as segmented and insular as many fandoms are.